|
New England Biolabs
pooled sgrna oligonucleotide library Pooled Sgrna Oligonucleotide Library, supplied by New England Biolabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/pooled sgrna oligonucleotide library/product/New England Biolabs Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pooled sgrna oligonucleotide library - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Addgene inc
sgrna plasmid library Sgrna Plasmid Library, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/sgrna plasmid library/product/Addgene inc Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sgrna plasmid library - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
98/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Twist Bioscience
sgrna oligonucleotide library ![]() Sgrna Oligonucleotide Library, supplied by Twist Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/sgrna oligonucleotide library/product/Twist Bioscience Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sgrna oligonucleotide library - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Addgene inc
lentiviral sgrna library backbone plasmid ![]() Lentiviral Sgrna Library Backbone Plasmid, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/lentiviral sgrna library backbone plasmid/product/Addgene inc Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lentiviral sgrna library backbone plasmid - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Addgene inc
human genome wide crispra sgrna library ![]() Human Genome Wide Crispra Sgrna Library, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/human genome wide crispra sgrna library/product/Addgene inc Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human genome wide crispra sgrna library - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Addgene inc
library expression vector pu6 sgrna ef1alpha puro t2a gfp ![]() Library Expression Vector Pu6 Sgrna Ef1alpha Puro T2a Gfp, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/library expression vector pu6 sgrna ef1alpha puro t2a gfp/product/Addgene inc Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
library expression vector pu6 sgrna ef1alpha puro t2a gfp - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Addgene inc
genome wide ko eko sgrna library ![]() Genome Wide Ko Eko Sgrna Library, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/genome wide ko eko sgrna library/product/Addgene inc Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
genome wide ko eko sgrna library - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Twist Bioscience
sgrna library ![]() Sgrna Library, supplied by Twist Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/sgrna library/product/Twist Bioscience Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sgrna library - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Addgene inc
human pooled genome wide sgrna library brunello sequences addgene addgene ![]() Human Pooled Genome Wide Sgrna Library Brunello Sequences Addgene Addgene, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/human pooled genome wide sgrna library brunello sequences addgene addgene/product/Addgene inc Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human pooled genome wide sgrna library brunello sequences addgene addgene - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Reprogramming of neuronal genome function and phenotype by astrocytes
doi: 10.64898/2026.03.07.710282
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Volcano plot showing the changes of n=222 ArN TF genes selected for Perturb-seq between N and N+A conditions, average of 4 time points. (B) Table showing statistics of sgRNA library design and data quality metrics for CRISPRi and CRISPRa pRE screens. (C) Scatterplot of showing the numbers of CRISPRi vs CRISPRa pRE targets per ArN TF gene, with genes that are up-regulated by astrocytes at the mRNA level colored in red, and genes down-regulated by astrocytes colored by blue. (D) Barplot showing that the dCas9-p300 cell line activates GRIN2A and MYOD genes by sgRNAs targeted at promoters and a distal regulatory element in differentiated neurons. (E) Histogram showing the distributions of base-pair distance between functional RE and target genes identified in the CRISPRi and CRISPRa pRE screens, respectively. (F) Barplots showing the distribution of # of target genes assigned to a functional RE, and # of functional REs assigned to a target gene, respectively. (G) Barplot showing the effects of CRISPRi on two different functional REs of the TF gene SIX3. The statistical test was done by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. **: adjusted p<0.01; ***: adjusted p<0.001. (H) Schematics showing a high-level overview of the single-cell analysis pipeline of the Perturb-seq screens, highlighting the methods used.
Article Snippet: The
Techniques: Functional Assay, Single-cell Analysis
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Reprogramming of neuronal genome function and phenotype by astrocytes
doi: 10.64898/2026.03.07.710282
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Stacked bar plots showing the numbers of targeted annotated primary TSSs, alternative TSSs, and unannotated TSSs based on the RNA-seq data generated in this study, in the CRISPRi/a promoter Perturb-seq experiments, respectively. (B) Table showing statistics of sgRNA library design and data quality metrics for CRISPRi and CRISPRa promoter screens. (C) Violin plot showing the number of cells per target region in the CRISPRa promoter Perturb-seq experiment, highlighting the MYC promoter as an outlier. (D) Violin plot showing the log2FC of the direct target genes in the CRISPRi and CRISPRa promoter Perturb-seq experiments, respectively, separated by positive controls (regardless of significance), TF genes with significant alteration in expression level (Sig. perturb.; p < 0.05), and TF genes with non-significant alteration (N.S. perturb.; p >= 0.05). (E) Jitter plot showing the basal expression levels of CRISPRi promoter target genes that were successfully (‘success’) or unsuccessfully (‘fail’) repressed (F) Bar plot showing the numbers of total global perturbation-gene links discovered by the 4 Perturb-seq experiments. Only those from the positive controls, statistically significant promoters (for the promoter experiments), and fREs (for the pRE experiments) are shown. (G) Jitter plot showing the numbers of global perturbation-gene links per perturbation. Only those from the positive controls, statistically significant promoters (for the promoter experiments), and fREs (for the pRE experiments) are shown. Top perturbations are labeled by its local or direct target gene, for fRE and promoter, respectively. Red bolded are positive controls.
Article Snippet: The
Techniques: RNA Sequencing, Generated, Expressing, Labeling
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Elucidating genes sufficient for viral entry into cells through sequential genome-wide CRISPR activation screens
doi: 10.64898/2026.03.06.710083
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Summary of gene deletion vs. gene overexpression approaches. (B) Rationale for the present study. (C) Experimental outline of the present study. (D) HEK293 and Jurkat cells were inoculated with different volumes of Ebola or rabies pseudovirus encoding a cell-surface marker (mCD19t; a truncated mutant of mouse CD19), followed by flow cytometry to determine the percentage of infected cells. This revealed that Jurkat cells are largely refractory to Ebola or rabies pseudovirus entry, relative to HEK293 cells. (E) Construction of a clonal Jurkat cell line, known as “Jurkat C6”, stably expressing a degron-tagged CRISPRa construct ( left ). Jurkat C6 cells were transduced with sgRNA targeting the endogenous human CD19 gene, in the presence or absence of TMP (1 μM) for 3 days, followed by flow cytometry to detect hCD19 expression ( right ). (F) At each of the indicated points of the genome-wide CRISPRa screen, the cell population was challenged with Ebola or rabies pseudovirus, and cell infectivity was evaluated by flow cytometry. Upon successive rounds of the screen, the cell population became progressively more susceptible to infection to either Ebola or rabies pseudovirus, respectively. (G) sgRNA distribution upon successive rounds of the genome-wide CRISPRa screen for Ebola pseudovirus entry. (H) sgRNA distribution upon successive rounds of the genome-wide CRISPRa screen for rabies pseudovirus entry.
Article Snippet: To achieve CRISPRa-mediated overexpression, sgRNA sequences were cloned into the
Techniques: Over Expression, Marker, Mutagenesis, Flow Cytometry, Infection, Stable Transfection, Expressing, Construct, Transduction, Genome Wide
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Elucidating genes sufficient for viral entry into cells through sequential genome-wide CRISPR activation screens
doi: 10.64898/2026.03.06.710083
Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Plasmids used to pseudotype non-replicating lentiviruses with either Ebola or rabies envelope proteins. EBOV-GP: glycoprotein of Ebola virus, Makona variant. RABV-GP N2C: glycoprotein of rabies virus, N2C variant. B) HEK293 and Jurkat cells were inoculated with different volumes of VSV envelope protein-pseudotyped lentivirus encoding a cell-surface marker (mCD19t; a truncated mutant of mouse CD19), followed by flow cytometry to determine the percentage of infected cells. This served as a positive control to confirm that Jurkat cells and HEK293 cells are both susceptible to VSV pseudovirus entry. C) Jurkat C6 cells were transduced with sgRNA targeting the endogenous human CD19 gene, in the presence of different TMP concentrations (0-4 μM) for 2-3 days, followed by flow cytometry to detect human CD19 expression.
Article Snippet: To achieve CRISPRa-mediated overexpression, sgRNA sequences were cloned into the
Techniques: Virus, Variant Assay, Marker, Mutagenesis, Flow Cytometry, Infection, Positive Control, Transduction, Expressing
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Elucidating genes sufficient for viral entry into cells through sequential genome-wide CRISPR activation screens
doi: 10.64898/2026.03.06.710083
Figure Lengend Snippet: A) NGFR was expressed in Jurkat C6 cells using CRISPRa, or alternatively, Jurkat cells using cDNA expression. NGFR -expressing or control cells were then inoculated with rabies pseudovirus encoding mCD19t. Flow cytometry was then performed to determine the percentage of infected cells. This revealed that NGFR expression significantly increased the susceptibility of Jurkat cells to rabies pseudovirus infection. As positive controls, flow cytometry was used to confirm successful delivery of the sgRNA construct as part of the CRISPRa workflow (as denoted by BFP expression) and that NGFR was expressed (upon cDNA expression). B) L-SIGN or DC-SIGN were expressed in primary human CD4 + T cells using cDNA expression. L-SIGN -expressing, DC-SIGN -expressing, or control cells were inoculated with rabies pseudovirus encoding hEGFRt (a truncated mutant of human EGFR). Flow cytometry was then performed to determine the percentage of infected cells. This revealed that L-SIGN or DC-SIGN expression significantly increased the susceptibility of Jurkat cells and primary T cells to Ebola pseudovirus infection. Cells expressing the highest levels of L-SIGN and DC-SIGN were preferentially infected by Ebola pseudovirus. C) L-SIGN or DC-SIGN were expressed in primary human CD4 + T cells using cDNA expression, and then L-SIGN -expressing, DC-SIGN -expressing, or control cells were inoculated with GFP -expressing Ebola virus or zsGreen -expressing Sudan virus under BSL4 containment. On days 0, 1, and 2 post-infection, flow cytometry was performed to determine the percentage of infected cells and qPCR was performed on cell culture supernatants to quantify viral genome replication. This revealed that L-SIGN or DC-SIGN expression enabled authentic Ebola and Sudan virus entry into primary human T cells, but viral genome replication was impaired, perhaps reflective of cell-intrinsic restriction factors.
Article Snippet: To achieve CRISPRa-mediated overexpression, sgRNA sequences were cloned into the
Techniques: Expressing, Control, Flow Cytometry, Infection, Construct, Mutagenesis, Virus, Cell Culture
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Elucidating genes sufficient for viral entry into cells through sequential genome-wide CRISPR activation screens
doi: 10.64898/2026.03.06.710083
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Summary of gene deletion vs. gene overexpression approaches. (B) Rationale for the present study. (C) Experimental outline of the present study. (D) HEK293 and Jurkat cells were inoculated with different volumes of Ebola or rabies pseudovirus encoding a cell-surface marker (mCD19t; a truncated mutant of mouse CD19), followed by flow cytometry to determine the percentage of infected cells. This revealed that Jurkat cells are largely refractory to Ebola or rabies pseudovirus entry, relative to HEK293 cells. (E) Construction of a clonal Jurkat cell line, known as “Jurkat C6”, stably expressing a degron-tagged CRISPRa construct ( left ). Jurkat C6 cells were transduced with sgRNA targeting the endogenous human CD19 gene, in the presence or absence of TMP (1 μM) for 3 days, followed by flow cytometry to detect hCD19 expression ( right ). (F) At each of the indicated points of the genome-wide CRISPRa screen, the cell population was challenged with Ebola or rabies pseudovirus, and cell infectivity was evaluated by flow cytometry. Upon successive rounds of the screen, the cell population became progressively more susceptible to infection to either Ebola or rabies pseudovirus, respectively. (G) sgRNA distribution upon successive rounds of the genome-wide CRISPRa screen for Ebola pseudovirus entry. (H) sgRNA distribution upon successive rounds of the genome-wide CRISPRa screen for rabies pseudovirus entry.
Article Snippet: The
Techniques: Over Expression, Marker, Mutagenesis, Flow Cytometry, Infection, Stable Transfection, Expressing, Construct, Transduction, Genome Wide
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Elucidating genes sufficient for viral entry into cells through sequential genome-wide CRISPR activation screens
doi: 10.64898/2026.03.06.710083
Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Plasmids used to pseudotype non-replicating lentiviruses with either Ebola or rabies envelope proteins. EBOV-GP: glycoprotein of Ebola virus, Makona variant. RABV-GP N2C: glycoprotein of rabies virus, N2C variant. B) HEK293 and Jurkat cells were inoculated with different volumes of VSV envelope protein-pseudotyped lentivirus encoding a cell-surface marker (mCD19t; a truncated mutant of mouse CD19), followed by flow cytometry to determine the percentage of infected cells. This served as a positive control to confirm that Jurkat cells and HEK293 cells are both susceptible to VSV pseudovirus entry. C) Jurkat C6 cells were transduced with sgRNA targeting the endogenous human CD19 gene, in the presence of different TMP concentrations (0-4 μM) for 2-3 days, followed by flow cytometry to detect human CD19 expression.
Article Snippet: The
Techniques: Virus, Variant Assay, Marker, Mutagenesis, Flow Cytometry, Infection, Positive Control, Transduction, Expressing
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Elucidating genes sufficient for viral entry into cells through sequential genome-wide CRISPR activation screens
doi: 10.64898/2026.03.06.710083
Figure Lengend Snippet: A) NGFR was expressed in Jurkat C6 cells using CRISPRa, or alternatively, Jurkat cells using cDNA expression. NGFR -expressing or control cells were then inoculated with rabies pseudovirus encoding mCD19t. Flow cytometry was then performed to determine the percentage of infected cells. This revealed that NGFR expression significantly increased the susceptibility of Jurkat cells to rabies pseudovirus infection. B) L-SIGN or DC-SIGN were expressed in Jurkat or primary human CD4 + T cells using cDNA expression. L-SIGN -expressing, DC-SIGN -expressing, or control cells were inoculated with rabies pseudovirus encoding hEGFRt (a truncated mutant of human EGFR). Flow cytometry was then performed to determine the percentage of infected cells. This revealed that L-SIGN or DC-SIGN expression significantly increased the susceptibility of Jurkat cells and primary T cells to Ebola pseudovirus infection. C) L-SIGN or DC-SIGN were expressed in primary human CD4 + T cells using cDNA expression, and then L-SIGN -expressing, DC-SIGN -expressing, or control cells were inoculated with GFP -expressing Ebola virus or zsGreen -expressing Sudan virus under BSL4 containment. Flow cytometry was then performed to determine the percentage of infected cells. This revealed that L-SIGN or DC-SIGN expression significantly increased the susceptibility of primary T cells to authentic Ebola and Sudan virus infection.
Article Snippet: The
Techniques: Expressing, Control, Flow Cytometry, Infection, Mutagenesis, Virus
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Elucidating genes sufficient for viral entry into cells through sequential genome-wide CRISPR activation screens
doi: 10.64898/2026.03.06.710083
Figure Lengend Snippet: A) NGFR was expressed in Jurkat C6 cells using CRISPRa, or alternatively, Jurkat cells using cDNA expression. NGFR -expressing or control cells were then inoculated with rabies pseudovirus encoding mCD19t. Flow cytometry was then performed to determine the percentage of infected cells. This revealed that NGFR expression significantly increased the susceptibility of Jurkat cells to rabies pseudovirus infection. As positive controls, flow cytometry was used to confirm successful delivery of the sgRNA construct as part of the CRISPRa workflow (as denoted by BFP expression) and that NGFR was expressed (upon cDNA expression). B) L-SIGN or DC-SIGN were expressed in primary human CD4 + T cells using cDNA expression. L-SIGN -expressing, DC-SIGN -expressing, or control cells were inoculated with rabies pseudovirus encoding hEGFRt (a truncated mutant of human EGFR). Flow cytometry was then performed to determine the percentage of infected cells. This revealed that L-SIGN or DC-SIGN expression significantly increased the susceptibility of Jurkat cells and primary T cells to Ebola pseudovirus infection. Cells expressing the highest levels of L-SIGN and DC-SIGN were preferentially infected by Ebola pseudovirus. C) L-SIGN or DC-SIGN were expressed in primary human CD4 + T cells using cDNA expression, and then L-SIGN -expressing, DC-SIGN -expressing, or control cells were inoculated with GFP -expressing Ebola virus or zsGreen -expressing Sudan virus under BSL4 containment. On days 0, 1, and 2 post-infection, flow cytometry was performed to determine the percentage of infected cells and qPCR was performed on cell culture supernatants to quantify viral genome replication. This revealed that L-SIGN or DC-SIGN expression enabled authentic Ebola and Sudan virus entry into primary human T cells, but viral genome replication was impaired, perhaps reflective of cell-intrinsic restriction factors.
Article Snippet: The
Techniques: Expressing, Control, Flow Cytometry, Infection, Construct, Mutagenesis, Virus, Cell Culture
Journal: Redox Biology
Article Title: CRISPR-based chemogenomic profiling reveals redox vulnerabilities to epigallocatechin-3-gallate and green tea polyphenol extract
doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2026.104047
Figure Lengend Snippet: Genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screen identifies genetic determinants of GTE-induced cytotoxicity. (A) Schematic overview of the experimental workflow for the genome-wide CRISPR knockout screen in NALM-6 cells treated with green tea extract (GTE), aimed at identifying genes modulating compound sensitivity. (B) Distribution of CRANKS scores for 19,034 genes following GTE treatment. Negative scores (red arrows, CRANKS ≤ −2) indicate sensitizer genes whose knockout enhances compound sensitivity, while positive scores (green arrows, CRANKS ≥2) represent rescuers whose knockout confers resistance. The 2D scatter plot is aligned with a one-dimensional frequency distribution, illustrating the thresholds used to define top hits. (C) Volcano plot showing CRANKS scores plotted against –log 10 p -values. Genes above the horizontal dashed line marks the p -threshold ( p < 0.05), while those beyond the vertical dashed lines exceed CRANKS thresholds of ±2, identifying 30 filtered genes ( p ≤ 0.01) labeled by gene symbol. Red points represent sensitizers; green points represent rescuers. Listed starred gene (∗) indicate top hits. (D) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of highest CRANKS-filtered candidates (|CRANKS| ≥ 2; p ≤ 0.01; set including all top hits). Bubble color reflects false discovery rate (FDR), ranging from light green (FDR = 9 × 10 −7 ) to dark blue (FDR = 4 × 10 −3 ), and bubble size corresponds to the number of genes in each pathway. Pathways are ranked by significance on the y-axis. Analysis was performed using the STRING database with whole-genome background, requiring a minimum of two genes per pathway and FDR ≤0.05.
Article Snippet: Briefly, a human NALM-6 (pre-B ALL lymphocytes) clone bearing an integrated inducible Cas9 expression cassette generated by lentiviruses made from pCW-Cas9 (
Techniques: Genome Wide, CRISPR, Knock-Out, Labeling
Journal: Redox Biology
Article Title: CRISPR-based chemogenomic profiling reveals redox vulnerabilities to epigallocatechin-3-gallate and green tea polyphenol extract
doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2026.104047
Figure Lengend Snippet: EGCG-induced pro-oxidant mechanisms: Insights from genome-wide CRISPR screening. (1) EGCG undergoes auto-oxidation generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) and quinone intermediates. A genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screen identified key genes modulating cellular response to EGCG-induced oxidative stress. (2) Knockouts of glutathione biosynthesis genes ( GCLC , GCLM , GSS ) impair H 2 O 2 detoxification, sensitizing cells to ferroptosis. (3) Peroxisomal genes ( PEX1 , PEX6 , PEX12 , PEX14 ) regulate ROS metabolism; their disruption compromises H 2 O 2 clearance via catalase ( CAT ) and peroxiredoxin-1 ( PRDX1 ). (4) The KEAP1-NRF2 axis controls antioxidant gene expression, inducing enzymes (e.g., CAT, PRDX1, GCLs) that mitigate ROS toxicity. KEAP1 knockout enhances NRF2 signaling and confers resistance. (5) Additional modulators include ABCC1 (drug efflux), SLC7A11 (cysteine transporter) and BAK1 (apoptosis). Sensitizer hits (red labels) indicate knockouts that heighten EGCG toxicity, while resistance hits (green labels) protect against cell death. Color intensity reflects CRANKS scores relative to the highest scoring genes. Together, these findings illustrate how EGCG's pro-oxidant activity can overwhelm cancer cell defenses when redox-regulating pathways are genetically compromised.
Article Snippet: Briefly, a human NALM-6 (pre-B ALL lymphocytes) clone bearing an integrated inducible Cas9 expression cassette generated by lentiviruses made from pCW-Cas9 (
Techniques: Genome Wide, CRISPR, Disruption, Gene Expression, Knock-Out, Activity Assay